My Books

  • Follow me on Twitter
My Photo

Subscribe my blog

  • Get this widget from Widgetbox
  • Add to Google
  • RSS FEEDS
  • Enter your Email here to subscribe :



    Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

« Why you should consider Spring in your Flex, BlazeDS and Livecycle DS scenarios | Main | Reduce the size of a Flex 3 application avoiding unnecessary references with the getQualifiedClassName() method »

Comments

Emanuele Cipolloni

Marco, I believe you are confusing "open source" with "source code" here. First of all, the fact that you need a "Flex Builder Professional license key" which is a paid component (699 US$) in order to extract the source code, kills already the concept of "open source". Second, once you have the source code, you can only study it, play with it, but certainly not using it in any project or fork a derivative project from it. So while its source code it is viewable, it is really "closed source".

Pawel

Hello Emanuele,

Actually it's open-source. It's not free software but it's open-source. Please review R. Stallman words ;)

Regards

Emanuele Cipolloni

The base Flex is open source, the advanced components like charting controls and the AdvancedDataGrid that Marco is referrring to are not open source at all. In fact other bloggers have reported the news stating that "It is not open-source but source is available for you to take a look and override functions with more confidence and knowledge of the internal workings."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment