After reading Bill's article on the last The Edge issue and some other posts, I was wondering the following question :
Why doesn't Adobe release a TRIAL version for Flash Lite 2 (or 1.1) ?
I'm seriously sure that having a trial version of the player could be a great breakthrough for overcoming the barriers to adoption.
For developers this could mean to be more persuasive in the phase of showing/proposing/selling contens.
I imagine this kind of scenario, where I could present my application(s) to a company (or even to a mobile operators or whatever) and give them the possibility to try the contents on their own for a specific period of time without forcing them to buy the Flash Lite player.
This would let companies the time to try/see/use and understand the real advantages and plus of a technology like Flash Lite.
The same is for mobile operators that could give their users the player (and contents) for a limited period of time and let them evaluate if buy or discard it.
The trial business model demonstrated to be a winning model.
I create a Poll on Flash Lite User Group, and I'd love to hear voices from all of you :
Do you think having a Flash Lite free trial version could increase the adoption of the player worldwide ?
I wonder if you could continue to battle, line guard carmelo wacker (Cameron Wake) and safe guard Chris Clemens (Chris Clemons) also on the bench ended Sunday's game
Posted by: cheap clothing | November 17, 2010 at 12:31 PM
The dolphins injury not limited to all-star quarterback, sectional feng jack - lang hurt my shoulder, too
Posted by: wholesale nfl jerseys | November 17, 2010 at 12:30 PM
I know he passed how hard effort to come back, he is a real professional player for the team, is very important."
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | November 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM